The hardest question is: "What do you want?"

Pick almost any activist at random and ask: “What do you want the ideal society to be?” and the likely answer will be a list of what he or she doesn’t want. Here are some responses I’ve been getting to this question:

• I want the banks to stop screwing us over!
• I want to see those corrupt politicians in jail
• I want the government to stop cutting public services

No one seems to hear the question I’m asking. Instead, they hear an invitation to voice their objections. The purest answer to such a question as: “What do you want?” is one that is born of aspiration, not objection. Let’s suppose the banks reform a little and clean up their act enough to satisfy the majority. Let’s suppose the most blatantly corrupt politicians are sent to jail and let’s suppose the government stops cutting public services: is that it? Can we all go home now? Is this the longed-for Utopia?

God! I hope not! I hope the youngest and brightest among us want more than that!

Where are the dreamers? Why are we so afraid to dream? Are we afraid of ridicule? How many of us have had our dreams and aspirations rebuffed with the phrase: “You have to be realistic!”?

I am writing this on my computer… a device that was once somebody’s unrealistic dream. I remember watching a TV show called Tomorrow’s World back in the 1970s and seeing an item about a printing device called a Plotter that could draw a crude copy of an equally crude design that had be drawn on a computer screen (BIG computer… tiny screen). I thought Wow! What I would give to just have a go on one of those! It never occurred to me that two decades later, I would be an illustrator using Photoshop and taking it for granted as part of my toolkit.

The time scale between an unrealistic dream and a generally accepted reality is getting exponentially shorter. Yet still we hurl sneering rebuttals such as pie-in-the-sky and dismiss the visionary as ‘just a dreamer’, as if the power to dream is something of no consequence and warrants contempt.

Then I describe my dream of a society that doesn’t need some fictional unit of value to get things done; a society in which people don’t need financial incentives to work for the benefit of the community because they are freed from the pressure of earning a living and the workplace is a joy to be a part of. A society in which workers are asked and never told… and always thanked for their input. I’ve worked in the voluntary sector during a prolonged period of unemployment back in the mid 80s and the experience is totally different to working for a profit-driven company.

It is not cost-effective for a company to employ a large workforce to work just a few hours a day so they employ minimal workforces who work long hours. Employers don’t like to see staff socializing and taking breaks when they are paying for their time and very few employers see any need to thank their employees. They pay them and consider that should be enough. Good performance is rarely rewarded but the threat of the penalties for poor performance hangs over the workforce like the sword of Damocles. Workers are paid, yes. But this isn’t a reward. This is simply the means by which they survive. They are undervalued and often underpaid. They see the boss (who earns five times their salary) arrive at ten thirty, bark orders down a telephone until lunchtime and go home. They often have no emotional attachment with the company, which is owned by someone who doesn’t even know their names and much less gives a toss about their welfare. It is little wonder that they long for the weekends and dread Mondays!

In a society free from money, they are free of the stresses of paying bills, free to enjoy the social environment of the workplace and can expect the respect and acknowledgment that their input deserves. They have an interest in the workplace, which belongs to the community and they feel valued. I would come out of retirement for that (otherwise, it would take a whole lotta money and a team of wild horses to drag me out of the freedom I enjoy now).

I describe an administrative system that works for the community as a local authority. But the word: “authority” is not to be confused with power. The administration must have the authority to enforce the laws (approved by the majority of the people) and conduct its duties. The administration has a degree of authority over the individual but, collectively, the people have authority over the administration. A vote could be called at any time to hold the elected administration to account and a majority vote has the final say. The power base is the people, not some ruling elite.

Administration would be much simpler because there would not be the requirement to balance highly complex, extremely volatile and ultimately fictional economies.

Although politicians insist that solar power and wind power are not feasible, the evidence suggests the contrary. Even in a cloudy rainy place like England, there are some homes equipped with efficient solar panels and a small wind turbine that provide 100% of the energy they require and even put a surplus into the National Grid. If one home can do this, every home can do it. Industries that require more energy than they can generate can utilise the surplus. What politicians and advocates for nuclear energy actually mean by "not feasible" is that there are no investment opportunities. Sunlight cannot be bought cheap and sold at a profit.

Every home can be equipped with water treatment equipment and sewage processing equipment to convert the waste into safe, usable compost and this can be utilized in the gardens in which each household grows all of the food it requires. That takes considerable pressure off the necessary infrastructure.

Products that are currently built to last only a short time to ensure a continual consumption of computers, phones, TVs and so on could be built to last a lifetime. Craftsmanship is no longer considered unfeasible because it doesn’t have to be cost-effective. Distribution is limited only by available resources, not by cost. Feeding famine and drought-stricken countries, irrigating deserts and medical research would no longer be hampered by cost.

Without money and power, there would be little crime, no oppression, no war and no greed.

The response I got to this description of my dream was:
“But I don’t want a solar panel! I want a thatched roof!”

Well, I guess it’s a start…


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 11/11/2011 - 5:45pm | Hah! that last quote was (Score: 1)
Fri, 11/11/2011 - 10:17pm | The issue is origination, (Score: 1)
Fri, 11/11/2011 - 10:17pm | The issue is origination, (Score: 0 Reduntant)
Fri, 11/11/2011 - 10:30pm | I was just thinking to myself (Score: 1)
Sat, 11/12/2011 - 3:07am | Why do we have to force (Score: 2 Insightful)

Ron Tocknell

Karma: 2

Why do we have to force people to do things? Why can't we simply make them pleasant tasks? This subject has already been covered and is worth a read, but, as I'm here:

When people talk about the problem of incentive to work in a moneyless society, they are invariably thinking of the workplace that exists in this profit-driven society. But cost-effectiveness is not an issue in the moneyless society. The workplace itself can be the incentive. Surprisingly, most skilled workers enjoy the work they do. They don't enjoy long hours, they don't enjoy the 'time-is-money' pressure they work under, they don't enjoy being told to get on with the job if they stop for a moment and chat to a colleague and quite often don't enjoy the conditions they work in. But all the things they don't enjoy are symptomatic of a profit-driven workplace. Imagine if the workforce was large enough for each worker to work just a couple of hours a day. Imagine if socialising with colleagues was encouraged. Imagine if leisure and entertainment facilities were provided as part of the perks to the job. Imagine if they could take a break when they wanted. Imagine if the manager advised instead of ordering and asked instead of delegating. Imagine if they were thanked for their input and imagine if they felt respected and valued.

OK. Let's look at a pretty thankless task: Cleaning toilets in an industrial complex. Imagine if the cleaner were respected and admired because they choose to do a task that few enjoy. Imagine if the rewards in terms of access to leisure facilities and so on were enhanced so they were more highly rewarded than those doing more enjoyable work. Imagine that the workplace was so enjoyable that the work is its own incentive. None of the approaches can be an option when cost-effectiveness and profit are the main goals.

The level of production required would be considerably less than it is now because profits depend on high consumer turnover so nothing is built to last. Imagine if craftsmanship were valued once again and things were built to last for life. Much more job satisfaction in that.

As for people who prefer to stay at home: Why not? The time in your life is the only time you get. work should be a choice and it's up to society to make it an attractive choice. We already have millions unemployed and we have to support them but we do so grudgingly. Well, society can support everyone and making work appealing will ensure enough fill the roles required. When work is not a choice, it is slavery. When work is a joy, slavery is unnecessary.

Fri, 11/11/2011 - 10:34pm | I would like a solar panel (Score: 1)
Sat, 11/12/2011 - 3:14am | You should want these things. (Score: 1)
Fri, 11/11/2011 - 11:05pm | I want a world in which the (Score: 1)
Sun, 11/13/2011 - 1:06pm | Excellent post Ron but as for (Score: 1)
Sun, 11/13/2011 - 8:24pm | Where did I mention increased (Score: 1)
Wed, 11/30/2011 - 2:20am | Awesome post mate. Wish this (Score: 1)
Thu, 12/01/2011 - 3:51am | An excellent post! (Score: 1)
Wed, 12/07/2011 - 2:32am | The traditional Nba hardware (Score: 1)
Wed, 12/07/2011 - 4:48pm | jaunjuan, would you be so (Score: 1)
Thu, 01/12/2012 - 5:30am | I really like your ideas (Score: 1)